On 07/06/2018 6:23 AM, Voeten, C.C. wrote:
Dear list,
I have been working on an R package for the past two years. It started as a
programming exercise for me to get acquainted with R, and because I had some
issues with lmerTest::step (the aim of my package was to automate the protocol
I use f
Dear Michael and Rune,
Yes, when I started I was hoping that my tinkering might eventually be absorbed
into lmerTest. Unfortunately, at the time, my knowledge of R and lmerTest was
not sufficient for me to hack at lmerTest, and once I had achieved what I
needed for LMMs in my own way (as a smal
On 7 June 2018 at 13:00, Michael Dewey wrote:
>
> One thing which occurs to me though is whether the maintaner of lmerTest
> would accept it into the package? If it has a different philosophy probably
> not but perhaps worth asking?
In the lmerTest-team we are always open to collaborations. A qui
Comments in-line
On 07/06/2018 11:23, Voeten, C.C. wrote:
Dear list,
I have been working on an R package for the past two years. It started as a
programming exercise for me to get acquainted with R, and because I had some
issues with lmerTest::step (the aim of my package was to automate the p
Dear list,
I have been working on an R package for the past two years. It started as a
programming exercise for me to get acquainted with R, and because I had some
issues with lmerTest::step (the aim of my package was to automate the protocol
I use for performing model comparisons using LRT, al
