On 10/11/17 13:10, François Michonneau wrote:
A github search might be helpful to identify packages that define macros
in their Rd files:
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=user%3Acran+extension%3Ard+newcommand&type=Code
Thanks. Looking into it.
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZ
A github search might be helpful to identify packages that define macros in
their Rd files:
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=user%3Acran+extension%3Ard+newcommand&type=Code
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> On 10/11/17 12:00, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> [Rolf Turner
On 10/11/17 12:00, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
[Rolf Turner wrote:]
... when I do the "R CMD
build" thing, when it comes to the "* building the PDF package manual"
step it says "Hmm ... looks like a package" (no shit, Sherlock!) and
emits a huge amount of verbose LaTeX diagnostics.
"Normally" one
On 09/11/2017 3:05 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and e
On 09/11/2017 3:05 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and e
On 09/11/2017 3:29 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
... Mr. Speaker.
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I re
... Mr. Speaker.
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and error.
This worked for
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and error.
This worked for me:
\newcommand
On 09/11/17 23:06, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Ah, yes. Of course! Duh! (Slaps forehead vigorously!)
Thanks.
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
___
Dear list members,
I have three packages on CRAN (asremlPlus, dae and imageData).
The current versions of all three packages can be built and installed using
build of 2017-06-27 r72859 development snapshot of R. I am doing this on a
64-bit laptop and a 64-bit desktop, both running Windows 10.
Did you write it from scratch or modify the function from the package
you were referencing? There may be some licensing issues you need to
consider either way.
-Dason
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:53 AM, LUCA BELMONTE wrote:
> Dear Brian,
> Dear Uwe,
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> I wrote a fun
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and error.
This worked for me:
\newcommand{\today}{\Sexpr{format(Sys.Date(),"\\\%d/\\
Note the % may be a comment?
Uwe
On 09.11.2017 06:05, Rolf Turner wrote:
I tried to define a macro to produce today's date (like unto the
"\today" command in LaTeX):
\newcommand{\today}{format(Sys.date(),"%d/%m/%Y")}
I put this into my *.Rd file just before invoking it. (Something like
"
Dear Brian,
Dear Uwe,
Thank you for your replies.
I wrote a function that does the same stuff that the suggested package
does.
Now there are no reference to suggested packages.
Best,
Luca
2017-11-08 18:03 GMT+01:00 Uwe Ligges :
> And even this cannot work for strong dependencies, as sztrong de
14 matches
Mail list logo
