[R-pkg-devel] Package valgrind problem I can't solve: Direction?

2017-10-25 Thread Peter Dunn
Hi all I am trying to compile (on my Mac) an R package (tweedie) which includes Fortran 77 code. I’m not much of a programmer, but can still manage to write and update F77 code. I’m new to valgrind. In checking my package (which passes the build-and-check with no errors), I use valgrind like t

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Semantic versioning and maintenance releases

2017-10-25 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 25/10/2017 4:28 PM, Shivaram Venkataraman wrote: Thanks for all the replies. I can see that the monotonic ordering is in-built to support the latest / best version model that CRAN has. That said it would be great if the policy could be relaxed to allow uploading older versions which don't nece

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Semantic versioning and maintenance releases

2017-10-25 Thread Shivaram Venkataraman
Thanks for all the replies. I can see that the monotonic ordering is in-built to support the latest / best version model that CRAN has. That said it would be great if the policy could be relaxed to allow uploading older versions which don't necessarily become the "best" version. Then we could ask u

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Semantic versioning and maintenance releases

2017-10-25 Thread Ben Bolker
On 17-10-25 03:47 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 25/10/2017 2:23 PM, Shivaram Venkataraman wrote: >> Hello >> >> We have an R package that uses semantic versioning -- i.e. version >> numbers >> are of the form major_version.minor_version.patch_version >> >> One of the ways we use the patch_versio

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Semantic versioning and maintenance releases

2017-10-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 October 2017 at 11:23, Shivaram Venkataraman wrote: | Hello | | We have an R package that uses semantic versioning -- i.e. version numbers | are of the form major_version.minor_version.patch_version | | One of the ways we use the patch_versions is to make maintenance releases | or security

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Semantic versioning and maintenance releases

2017-10-25 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 25/10/2017 2:23 PM, Shivaram Venkataraman wrote: Hello We have an R package that uses semantic versioning -- i.e. version numbers are of the form major_version.minor_version.patch_version One of the ways we use the patch_versions is to make maintenance releases or security fixes that users c

[R-pkg-devel] Semantic versioning and maintenance releases

2017-10-25 Thread Shivaram Venkataraman
Hello We have an R package that uses semantic versioning -- i.e. version numbers are of the form major_version.minor_version.patch_version One of the ways we use the patch_versions is to make maintenance releases or security fixes that users can apply without worrying about any functionality chan

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Future location of Rtools?

2017-10-25 Thread Martyn Plummer
On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 10:52 +0200, Uwe Ligges wrote: > > On 25.10.2017 10:48, "Jens Oehlschlägel" wrote: > > Good morning, > > > > Duncan has announced that he steps back from the maintenance of Rtools. > > Where will I find the new Rtools toolchain that complements Microsofts > > R-version? >

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Future location of Rtools?

2017-10-25 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 25.10.2017 10:48, "Jens Oehlschlägel" wrote: Good morning, Duncan has announced that he steps back from the maintenance of Rtools. Where will I find the new Rtools toolchain that complements Microsofts R-version? Just take the Rtools. Microsoft uses our toolchain as far as I know. Also n

[R-pkg-devel] Future location of Rtools?

2017-10-25 Thread Jens Oehlschlägel
Good morning, Duncan has announced that he steps back from the maintenance of Rtools. Where will I find the new Rtools toolchain that complements Microsofts R-version? Kind regards Jens > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2017 um 12:27 Uhr > Von: "Duncan Murdoch" > An: r-annou...@r-proje