Hi Iñaki,
OK, it sounds like we have no practical disagreement: you're planning to
keep separate packages and then have a third one for integration. That will
be fine for people like me who don't necessarily want to specify units for
our regressions. I look forward to seeing this!
Cheers,
David
2017-10-06 22:38 GMT+02:00 Bill Denney :
> Hi Iñaki and David,
>
> I fully see the need in a standardized unit package, and I understand the
> need for propagation of errors (though I'm in the opposite camp to David
> where I usually need unit tracking and conversion and rarely need error
> prop
2017-10-06 22:28 GMT+02:00 David Hugh-Jones :
> Many measurements have no unit, but some uncertainty - e.g. the b and se
> from an arbitrary regression. Can you give specific examples of the
> advantages from binding these packages tightly together?
As Duncan already pointed out, the units of b an
