Re: [R-pkg-devel] R Packages Never Finish Check

2016-09-30 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 30/09/2016 12:24 PM, Ortega, Cameron wrote: Hi, When I attempt to run Check on any package, the "checking installed package size..." Check never finishes. This is across multiple versions of R and RStudio, with every package I have attempted to run, including packages confirmed to pass Chec

[R-pkg-devel] R Packages Never Finish Check

2016-09-30 Thread Ortega, Cameron
Hi, When I attempt to run Check on any package, the "checking installed package size..." Check never finishes. This is across multiple versions of R and RStudio, with every package I have attempted to run, including packages confirmed to pass Check quickly and with no issues for others. I have

Re: [R-pkg-devel] C++11: which is currently the most portable option?

2016-09-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 30 September 2016 at 09:16, Charles Determan wrote: | I believe you could just put the following in your DESCRIPTION file so the | R version takes care of the C++11 flag. | | SystemRequirements: C++11 This is _one_ of _two_ equivalent choices, the other (which is my preference) is to add this

Re: [R-pkg-devel] C++11: which is currently the most portable option?

2016-09-30 Thread Charles Determan
Hi Constantinos, I believe you could just put the following in your DESCRIPTION file so the R version takes care of the C++11 flag. SystemRequirements: C++11 Regards, Charles On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Costas Tsirogiannis wrote: > Greetings, > > I am developing a package that uses C++

[R-pkg-devel] C++11: which is currently the most portable option?

2016-09-30 Thread Costas Tsirogiannis
Greetings, I am developing a package that uses C++ code, and I want to use some classes from the C++11 standard. In fact I just want to use std::thread which is supported even by the old weird -std=c++0x option. Since the support of the C++11 standard increases more and more as time goes by, I wo