On 08/04/2016 11:51 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 August 2016 at 11:46, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| If my package has a test that needs another package, but that package is
| not needed in the /R code of my package, then I indicate it as
| "Suggests", not as "Depends" nor as "Imports". If that
On 04/08/2016 12:55 PM, Bill Denney wrote:
On 8/4/2016 11:51 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 August 2016 at 11:46, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| If my package has a test that needs another package, but that package is
| not needed in the /R code of my package, then I indicate it as
| "Suggests", not a
On 04.08.2016 18:55, Bill Denney wrote:
On 8/4/2016 11:51 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 August 2016 at 11:46, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| If my package has a test that needs another package, but that
package is
| not needed in the /R code of my package, then I indicate it as
| "Suggests", not as
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
[...]
> I'd say it's up to you as the author of the test. Would skipping that test
> mean that your package was not adequately tested? If so, then you should
> get an error if it isn't available, because otherwise people will think
> they've
On 8/4/2016 11:51 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 August 2016 at 11:46, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| If my package has a test that needs another package, but that package is
| not needed in the /R code of my package, then I indicate it as
| "Suggests", not as "Depends" nor as "Imports". If that packa
On 04/08/2016 11:46 AM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
(One question from the thread Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies?)
I hope not to start another long tangled thread, but I have a basic
confusion which I think has a yes/no answer and I would like to know if
there is agreement on this point (or is
On 04.08.2016 17:46, Paul Gilbert wrote:
(One question from the thread Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies?)
I hope not to start another long tangled thread, but I have a basic
confusion which I think has a yes/no answer and I would like to know if
there is agreement on this point (or is i
On 4 August 2016 at 11:46, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| If my package has a test that needs another package, but that package is
| not needed in the /R code of my package, then I indicate it as
| "Suggests", not as "Depends" nor as "Imports". If that package is not
| available when I run R CMD check,
(One question from the thread Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies?)
I hope not to start another long tangled thread, but I have a basic
confusion which I think has a yes/no answer and I would like to know if
there is agreement on this point (or is it only me that is confused as
usual).
I
Thx folks. I didn't mean to cause a stir :-)
I've had colleagues receive cease & desists (and worse) before and
it's been my experience that a large # of folks have no idea these
type of cite restrictions exist.
-Bob
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
> CRAN will follow up with t
ROpenSci's onboarding process has a checkbox for confirming that the
package "does not violate the Terms of Service of any service it
interacts with.":
https://github.com/ropensci/onboarding/blob/master/issue_template.md
I also have a vague memory of this discussion a few years ago on
R-help/-dev
On 03/08/2016 9:15 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 3 August 2016 at 17:35, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| No, you are reading something into my messages that isn't there. I
| think I understand your suggestion now (CRAN should test with no
| Suggested packages present, not with all of them present).
CRAN will follow up with the package maintainer.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.08.2016 10:50, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 04 Aug 2016, at 05:21 , Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 3 August 2016 at 22:26, Bob Rudis wrote:
| I came across https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/boxoffice/index.html
| in CRAN
On 03/08/2016 10:26 PM, Bob Rudis wrote:
I came across https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/boxoffice/index.html
in CRAN today and while I don't expect CRAN to be a legal authority,
should there not be some kind of policy for excluding R packages that
deliberately violate (data) site ToS? (I'm a
On 04 Aug 2016, at 05:21 , Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 3 August 2016 at 22:26, Bob Rudis wrote:
> | I came across https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/boxoffice/index.html
> | in CRAN today and while I don't expect CRAN to be a legal authority,
> | should there not be some kind of policy f
15 matches
Mail list logo
