So, how do we create a solid alternative to CRAN? github drat wld have
been impossible at my previous gig (for good reasons). Is it time to
try to get rOpenSci to be a legit CRAN alternative? Add enough process
around it to support things like this (i.e. a less narrowly focused
Bioconductor)? Packa
My $0.02:
On 18 April 2016 at 20:23, boB Rudis wrote:
| I would hope CRAN would let this in with some validation (even to the
| point of it possibly adding a new field to DESCRIPTION). It may never
| run on Slolaris or Plan 9, and I - who now runs a CRAN mirror in the
| hopes to eventually have a
I would hope CRAN would let this in with some validation (even to the
point of it possibly adding a new field to DESCRIPTION). It may never
run on Slolaris or Plan 9, and I - who now runs a CRAN mirror in the
hopes to eventually have a MacBuilder equivalent service at some point
in the near future
Good day,
I've written an Rcpp-backed R package
(https://github.com/Ironholds/poster) that interfaces with the
libpostal (https://github.com/openvenues/libpostal) library, written
in C.
While the two play together perfectly nicely, the problem is
submitting the package to CRAN: libpostal is not a
