On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Wayne Taylor wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I received results from a package development check. On some platforms, I
> receive numerous errors such as:
>
> [my own function]: no visible global function definition for ‘boxplot’
> [my own function]: no visible binding
Good afternoon,
I received results from a package development check. On some platforms, I
receive numerous errors such as:
[my own function]: no visible global function definition for ‘boxplot’
[my own function]: no visible binding for global variable ‘quantile’
[my own function]: no visible glob
I was kind of hoping to avoid reference classes. The optimization stuff
it giving me enough headaches. I've used a local environment
successfully in the Rtnmin package (it is a direct conversion from my
brother's TN Matlab package, which was able to use "globals" there).
JN
On 15-07-10 04:17 PM,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:50 PM, ProfJCNash wrote:
> I have a general question about appropriate design for a fairly
> complicated package, as I am redesigning and rebuilding the optimx
> package. It will get a new name as it appears that the calls will change
> in order to accommodate new functi
I have a general question about appropriate design for a fairly
complicated package, as I am redesigning and rebuilding the optimx
package. It will get a new name as it appears that the calls will change
in order to accommodate new functionality. I plan to make it
fairly easy to add new optimizatio
