I have a data set (csv); e.g.,
ID samp1 samp2 samp3 samp4
G1 2332 12 87
G2 8545 49 76
G3 1246 39 28
G4 7326 18 13
and read it:
data1<-(read.csv("Datafolder/rawdata.csv",header=T))
It is fine with
Data has the first row for variable name and the first column for sample
name. I want to take "Log" for all data, but how to compute without the
first column for sample name.
> log.raw_data=log(raw_data,base=2)
Error in Math.data.frame(list(sample_id = c(1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 7L, :
non-nume
Hello,
Considering 5 points in X-Y plain. Data is a 5*2 matrix (5 rows for samples
& 2 columns for X and Y)
With a distance from the origin, if a distance < 7, remove the row from the
Data.
After calculating the distance for each point, I can't forward because of
this "Removing" problem.
Anyone
Hello,
I have different results from these two softwares for a simple binomial GLM
problem.
>From Genmod in SAS: LogLikelihood=-4.75, coeff(intercept)=-3.59,
coeff(x)=0.95
>From glm in R: LogLikelihood=-0.94, coeff(intercept)=-3.99, coeff(x)=1.36
Is there anyone tell me what I did wrong?
Here
Hello,
The likelihood includes two parameters to be estimated: lambda
(=beta0+beta1*x) and alpha. The algorithm for the estimation is as
following:
1) with alpha=0, estimate lambda (estimate beta0 and beta1 via GLM)
2) with lambda, estimate alpha via ML estimation
3) with updataed alpha, replica
I use "while" loop but it produces an errro. I have no idea about this.
Error in "[<-"(`*tmp*`, i, value = numeric(0)) :
nothing to replace with
The problem description is
The likelihood includes two parameters to be estimated: lambda
(=beta0+beta1*x) and alpha. The algorithm for the e
I have an error for a simple optimization problem. Is there anyone knowing
about this error?
lambda1=-9
lambda2=-6
L<-function(a){
s2i2f<-(exp(-lambda1*(250^a)-lambda2*(275^a-250^a))
-exp(-lambda1*(250^a)-lambda2*(300^a-250^a)))
logl<-log(s2i2f)
return(-logl)}
optim(1,L)
Error in optim(1,
Hi there,
The data is
data<-c(2,6,13,26,19,25,18,11,22,25)
I want to count data for these rages:
[0~10]:
[11~20]:
[21-30]:
Is anyone can help me?
Thank you in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/count-data-with-a-specific-range-tp19732290p19732290.html
Sent from
,30)))
>
> (0,10] (10,20] (20,30]
> 2 4 4
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:41 PM, sandsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> The data is
>>
>> data<-c(2,6,13,26,19,25,18,11,22,25)
>>
>> I want
Hi there,
I have a data set:
a=cbind(5,2,4,7,8,3,4,11,1,20)
I want to count # of data, satistfying a[1]http://www.nabble.com/count-data-with-some-conditions-tp20275722p20275722.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
R-help@r
more deviously:
>
> > sum( a[1] [1] 4
>
> --
> David Winsemius, MD
> Heritage Labs.
>
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 7:56 PM, sandsky wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I have a data set:
>>
>> a=cbind(5,2,4,7,8,3,4,11,1,20)
>>
&g
Is there anyone knowing a function for standard normal cumulative
distribution?
Φ(z=-0.1)=?
also
Φ(z=?)=0.025
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/function-for-standard-normal-cumulative-distribution-tp20282804p20282804.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.
Hi,
I am thinking about IWLS vs ML estimation. When I use glm() for a
2-parameter distribution (e.g., Weibull), I can otain the MLE of scale
parameter given shape parameter through IWLS. Because this scale parameter
usually converges to the MLE.
In this point, I am wondering:
i) can you say th
a the
numerical solution.
Do you have any idea for this?
Thank you,
Jinsuk Lee
Research Associate
Dept. of Industrial Engineering,
Arizona State University, USA
office: (480)-965-8468
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Prager wrote:
>
> sandsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am
14 matches
Mail list logo