Dear Mr/Mrs,
This is my first time working in R studio.
I have a database of 36 participants but it has 150600 entries.
Column - Column - Column- Column
Participant Activityprobe - Activity Level - High/low/none
Participant Screenprobe - screenon/off -
Parti
edetailed ==3271)
>
> using suitable logical statements and then tabulating them by
> ParticipantID. If you know how to do that in SPSS, it won't be too
> hard to translate the logical statements into R syntax as above. I may
> have misunderstood the variable names, but I think
ng an observation every time some specified change
> >>> of state is sensed on each device. I'll also assume that you are
> >only
> >>> recording four types of measurement. It seems that you want to
> >>> aggregate these events for each subject over
s being used for the decimal point and the separator as if
> it is from the Netherlands they may not be the default settings.
>
> michael
>
> On 06/01/2019 16:37, Rachel Thompson wrote:
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > Thanks for your email.
> > I am an intern from Amste
at is being used for the decimal point and the separator as if
> > it is from the Netherlands they may not be the default settings.
> >
> > michael
> >
> > On 06/01/2019 16:37, Rachel Thompson wrote:
> >> Hi Jeff,
> >>
> >> Thanks for you
, but I need to look into what Jeff said about the guides.
So I am able to share it.
Best.
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:51 AM Rich Shepard
wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019, Rachel Thompson wrote:
>
> > I am an intern from Amsterdam and I have to do an analysis in R. I spoke
> >
frequency tables and two-way contingency
> tables.
>
> If you have followup questions for the list, you can use the examples in
> ?table as your starting point.
> That way you don't need to worry about sharing your own data.
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 1:59 PM Rache
8 AM K. Elo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Not having a data chunk prevents me from testing abit, but maybe you
> should take a look on:
>
> ?table
> ?xtabs
>
> to start with.
>
> But as already suggested by other users, a small data set would be of
> great help :)
>
>
AM PIKAL Petr wrote:
> Hi Rachel.
>
> You already have got several suggestions, but results depend on structure
> of your data. The best way from your side would be just copy a part of your
> data directly to email and preferable way is to use "dput".
>
> Assumi
e
> > of your data. The best way from your side would be just copy a part of
> your
> > data directly to email and preferable way is to use "dput".
> >
> > Assuming your data already transfered to R are called "mydata".
> >
> > You can just copy
10 matches
Mail list logo
