ngth (arg 1)
All I want is to have the extra Std.Estimate and Tolerance columns
without changing anything else in the regression output. Any help is
appreciated!
Thanks,
Matthew Dubins
__
R-help@r-project.org mai
nges to the precision!
Thanks,
Matthew Dubins
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
me. Is there anyway to apply this sort of calculation without
splitting the original vector up? I tried a really complex ifelse
statement but it didn't seem to work.
Thanks in advance,
Matthew Dubins
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https
Hi,
Thanks so much! I got what I needed: z scores, according to group
membership, in one vector.
Matthew Dubins
Erik Iverson wrote:
> Hello -
>
> First, I doubt you really want to cbind() those two vectors within the
> data.frame() function call.
>
> test.data <- dat
ve me (or rather, the
inquiring student).
Cheers,
Matthew Dubins
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, mi
int(t.test(formula, data = subset(data, sub == i), ...))
}
}
Is there already a similar function in some package?
Thanks,
Matthew Dubins
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the post
ote:
> See by()
>
> Matthew Dubins wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I wrote a simple function that gives me multiple t.test results
>> according to a subset variable and am wondering whether or not I
>> reinvented the wheel. Observe:
>>
>> t.test.sub &l
and 3).
So far it seems like my method is more straightforward!
Julian Burgos wrote:
> Could you post some of your data and your initial test, and explain
> why it didn't worked? It is difficult to figure out what is the
> problem with your call to by().
>
> Julian
>
ample t-test
>
> data: percent by group
> t = -0.1541, df = 3.506, p-value = 0.886
> alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
> 95 percent confidence interval:
> -66.87207 60.20541
> sample estimates:
> mean in group High mean in group Low
>
9 matches
Mail list logo