Hi All
When you print a function constructed within a function, R prints it's
environment.
For example:
> myfunction = function ()
+ { f = function () NULL
+ attributes (f) = list (class="myfunction", myattribute=1)
+ f
+ }
> myfunction.f = myfunction ()
> myfunction.f
function ()
NUL
hi all
I would like to introduce my R package:
empirical: Probability Distributions as Models of Data
The description is:
Computes continuous (not step) empirical (and nonparametric) probability
density, cumulative distribution and quantile functions. Supports
univariate, multivariate and conditi
My R package, "probhat", provides plots of bivariate PDFs and bivariate
CDFs, using kernel smoothing.
Note that there is no bivariate quantile function, as such.
Here's the vignette:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/probhat/vignettes/probhat.pdf
This contains examples.
Note that I'm not s
Note that your post has no subject line.
I can't find it in my emails, which may explain why no one else has replied.
> fo<-h~a+b*log(dbh)+c*(log(dbh))^2+1.3
I'm assuming that you want to fit a model with three parameters, a, b and c.
This would be a linear model (linear in the parameters).
I'm g
> Does anyone have a recommendation for the best package/function for doing
> surface plots?
> What I am looking for is one with a lot of functionality like easily rotate
> the plot and so on.
There is persp() and the rgl package, as Duncan has already mentioned.
However (I'm probably biased h
> My data has a few problems: (1) I think I will need to fix the effects of
> seasonal variation (Monthly) and (2) of possible spatial correlation
> (probability of finding an item is higher after finding one since they can
> come from the same ship). (3) How do I handle the fact that the
> measure
> > My data has a few problems: (1) I think I will need to fix the effects
of
> > seasonal variation (Monthly) and (2) of possible spatial correlation
> > (probability of finding an item is higher after finding one since they
can
> > come from the same ship). (3) How do I handle the fact that the
>
This is possibly off topic now...
However, given that it involves mgcv, I think that it's relevant to R.
> to test if there is a change over the years on the amount of debris in
these locations and more specifically a change after the implementation of
a mitigation strategy
> My debris items per
8 matches
Mail list logo
