Hi,
I am still learning and find it very helpful in my research. I have searched
before posting this and could not figure out if there is a way to compare
matrices the way i am describing below:
I have a matrix of 64 cols and 64 rows which mostly has lots of zeros but has
other non-zero posit
I'll check that book out and/or get help from the authors. But i was still
hoping there is some basic way to compare these 3d plots using R.
By the way, I figured out i can draw these plots using command "image" and
get a gradient heat map or topography map with gradients. Is there a
function in
Hi,
I have a binary file which has the following structure:
1) Some header in the beginning
2) Thousands of 216-byte data sub-grouped into 4 54-byte data structured as
4-byte time stamp (big endian) followed by 50 1-byte (8-bit) samples.
So far this is how I am trying:
#Open a connection for bina
Thanks! I'll give that a try.
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/readBin-which-has-two-different-sizes-tp2953365p2953619.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
ht
Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
>
> 1. Use x <- readBin(..., what="raw", n=35269*(54*4)) to read your raw
> ("byte") data.
> 2. Turn it into a 54x4x35269 array, e.g. dim(x) <- c(54,4,35269).
> 3. Extract the 4-byte time stamps by yT <- x[1:4,,,drop=FALSE]; This
> is of type "raw". Use readBin() to
Hi all,
I have a matrix of a mountain of form 21x21 and values in them are height
(Z). Using the persp function I can view this mountain in 3D.
Now, I am trying to find a measure to find the centre of gravity (maybe
centroid?) of this mountain. Any idea what would be the best way to go?
--
View
Thanks! Works great.
I have more questions on this, so I'll continue here:
Now that I have the weighted mean, is it possible to reduce the size of
mountain based on this weighted mean such the original matrix remains 21x21
while the mountain shrinks/converges.
Step for my analysis:
1) Find cent
Peter Langfelder wrote:
>
> Sorry, I'm not sure what you want to do in points 2-4. Shrink the
> mountain vertically or horizontally? You can for example look up image
> resizing algorithms if you want to shrink the area under the mountain
> but keep the shape of the mountain (approximately) the
8 matches
Mail list logo