On Jun 24, 2013, at 15:21 , Sarah Goslee wrote:
> G'morning.
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:22 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 23, 2013, at 22:30 , Sarah Goslee wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> If you're doing exactly as described below, then you need to add the
>>> data argument to wilcox.te
G'morning.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:22 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>
> On Jun 23, 2013, at 22:30 , Sarah Goslee wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> If you're doing exactly as described below, then you need to add the
>> data argument to wilcox.test so R knows where to find beforesmall and
>> aftersmall. But if
On Jun 23, 2013, at 22:30 , Sarah Goslee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you're doing exactly as described below, then you need to add the
> data argument to wilcox.test so R knows where to find beforesmall and
> aftersmall. But if so, that's a rather uninformative error message.
>
> Saraj
Not really, if
On Jun 23, 2013, at 11:34 AM, ruth parker wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been trying to run a wilcox paired test on some data
> beforesmall aftersmall
> [1,]63.5 512.0
> [2,]54.5 237.5
> [3,]52.5 161.5
> [4,]78.0 153.5
> [5,]53.5 68.0
> [6,]
HI,
May be this helps:
dat1<- read.table(text="
beforesmall aftersmall
63.5 512.0
54.5 237.5
52.5 161.5
78.0 153.5
53.5 68.0
50.5 65.5
69.0 52.0
76.0 59.0
68.0 66.5
75.5 66.5
67.0 45.5
81.0 54.5
49.0 44.0
51.0 42.5
53.0
Hi,
If you're doing exactly as described below, then you need to add the
data argument to wilcox.test so R knows where to find beforesmall and
aftersmall. But if so, that's a rather uninformative error message.
Saraj
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 2:34 PM, ruth parker wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been trying t
6 matches
Mail list logo
