Thank you very much for the tip! Using imagemagick i got an image of reasonable
quality without making the file size that large. Regards Roman Von:
"Philipp Pagel-5 [via R]"
Gesendet: 20.05.2011
09:50:42 An: Layman123 Betre
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:35:51PM -0700, Layman123 wrote:
> I tried both, the plot devices in R and pdftk. First I tried the png-device,
> but as I wanted to increase the number of pixels with 'width' and 'height',
> the labels are getting smaller
When I really need a png, I usually produce a pd
Thank you all for the quick answers!
I googled first instead of having the idea to search this forum...
I'm using R 2.12.2 on a 32-bit Computer with windows installed.
Up to this point I was trying to get the image the way I would like to have
it, but didn't get fully satisfactory results.
I trie
You can try something like this, at the command line:
gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dCompatibilityLevel=1.5 -dPDFSETTINGS=/screen
-dNOPAUSE -dQUIET -dBATCH -sOutputFile=output.pdf input.pdf
evidently, the new compactPDF() function in R 2.13 does something very similar.
-Aaron
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at
On 19/05/2011 11:14 AM, Layman123 wrote:
Hi everyone,
My data consists of a system of nearly 75000 roads, available as a
shapefile. When I plot the road system, by adding the individual roads with
'lines' and store it as a pdf-file with 'pdf' I get a file of size 13 MB.
This is way too large to
This was answered on this list a few days ago. See
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2011-May/278029.html
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Layman123 wrote:
Hi everyone,
My data consists of a system of nearly 75000 roads, available as a
shapefile. When I plot the road system, by adding the individual
6 matches
Mail list logo