Hi Martin
What do you think of the following code ?
A <- 1
imputeMyObj <- function(x){
xImp <- 3 #Calcul for Imputation of x
nam<-deparse(substitute(x))
assign(nam,xImp,envir=parent.frame())
}
imputeMyObj(A)
A
I guess it is not usual, but do you think it is 'bad' programming or
will have
Thanks a lot
> The 'usual' way to write the above code is
>
>
>> a <- imputeMyObj(a)
>>
:-(
I was hopping something like the use of the superassignator <<- inside
imputeMyObj (I was hoping even if I did not find it myself)...
To bad.
But thanks for teaching me 'usual' pratice. It is somet
Christophe Genolini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi the list,
>
> I am defining S4 objet. Is it possbile to define a method that change
> the slot of an object without using <- ?
> My object contain a numeric and a matrix. At some point, I would like to
> impute the missing value in the matrix.
3 matches
Mail list logo