Re: [R] Recommended packages for a statistician

2009-04-06 Thread Martin Maechler
> "LV" == Luc Villandre > on Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:42:34 -0400 writes: LV> Hi, LV> Pretty hard to say. It really depends on what you want to. LV> MASS, nlme, lme4 and Hmisc are packages I use on a daily basis. Note that MASS is part of the VR bundle, and that and nlme are

Re: [R] Recommended packages for a statistician

2009-04-06 Thread Luc Villandre
Hi, Pretty hard to say. It really depends on what you want to. MASS, nlme, lme4 and Hmisc are packages I use on a daily basis. I guess you could also ask for those. David Scott wrote: On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Eamonn O'Brien wrote: The company I work for require users to request what packages they

Re: [R] Recommended packages for a statistician

2009-04-02 Thread David Scott
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Eamonn O'Brien wrote: The company I work for require users to request what packages they want from the IT department (user cannot download themselves). I intend to request installation of the latest version of R plus the 23 Cran task views. As a statistician what are the reco

Re: [R] Recommended Packages

2008-03-02 Thread Wensui Liu
I am using the same get-em-all approach as yours. FYI. it is about 2G with all packages installed. On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Murray Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having just update to R 2.6.2 on my old Windows laptop I notice that the > number of packages is growing exponentially

Re: [R] Recommended Packages

2008-03-02 Thread Gavin Simpson
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 10:52 +1300, Murray Jorgensen wrote: > Having just update to R 2.6.2 on my old Windows laptop I notice that the > number of packages is growing exponentially and my usual approach of > get-em-all may not be viable much longer. Has any thought been given to > dividing "contr