Thank you very much Professor .Peter Dalgaard for your kind explanations..
This made my work easy.. I am struggling with this for more than 2 days and
now I got the correct reply.
Thank again.
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Maximum-Likelihood-Estimation-Poisson-d
Thank you S Ellison-2 for your reply. I will understand it with Prof.Peter
Dalgaard's answer..
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Maximum-Likelihood-Estimation-Poisson-distribution-mle-stats4-tp4635464p4635484.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.c
On Jul 5, 2012, at 10:48 , chamilka wrote:
> Hi everyone!
> I am using the mle {stats4} to estimate the parameters of distributions by
> MLE method. I have a problem with the examples they provided with the
> mle{stats4} html files. Please check the example and my question below!
> *Here is the m
> -Original Message-
> > sample.mean<- sum(x*y)/sum(y)
> > sample.mean
> [1] 3.5433
>
> *This is the contradiction!! *
> Here I am getting the estimate as 3.5433(which is reasonable
> as most of the values are clustered around 3), but mle code
> gives the estimate 11.545(which may not be
4 matches
Mail list logo