Hello Jim,
Thanks for your pointer. Could you be more specific how I can implement
your strategy?
Thanks and regards,
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jim Lemon wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 07:01 AM, Christofer Bogaso wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thanks for your answer.
>>
>> However I was thinking i
On 08/06/2013 07:01 AM, Christofer Bogaso wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for your answer.
However I was thinking if it would be possible to have the Vertical-scroll
bar, so that user can scroll his screen while still having all the bars on
the plot clearly.
Is there any possibility?
Hi Christofer,
Hi David,
Thanks for your answer.
However I was thinking if it would be possible to have the Vertical-scroll
bar, so that user can scroll his screen while still having all the bars on
the plot clearly.
Is there any possibility?
Thanks and regards,
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, David Carlson
It doesn't seem "messed up." You can't expect to plot two thousand
bars on a graph and really see anything. On my monitor, there are
only about 680 vertical pixels on the plot window, you are trying to
plot 3 bars for each row of dots on the monitor!
Try this (just the first twenty lines of your d
... and also have a look at ?dotplot.
-- Bert
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
> If you insist on bars instead of points, then have a look at the type
> ="h" argument to plot.default().
>
> In general, designing an effective plot typically depends both on the
> nature of the su
If you insist on bars instead of points, then have a look at the type
="h" argument to plot.default().
In general, designing an effective plot typically depends both on the
nature of the subject matter, the data, and the intended audience, so
it is difficult (for me, anyway) to give a useful gener
6 matches
Mail list logo
