r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Citing R/Packages Question
I've had an email exchange with the authors of a recent paper in Nature who
also made a good faith effort to cite both R and the quantreg package, and
were told that the Nature "house style" didn't allow such citations
gt;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
> Behalf Of roger koenker
> Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 8:36 AM
> To: Derek Ogle
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] Citing R/Packages Question
>
> I&#x
: Saturday, May 09, 2009 8:36 AM
To: Derek Ogle
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Citing R/Packages Question
I've had an email exchange with the authors of a recent paper in Nature who
also made a good faith effort to cite both R and the quantreg package, and
were told that the Nature "h
Most common styles (e.g. APA, Harvard) include the date of access for an
electronic reference. While this may be an artifact of history, both
reviewers and editors are justified in asking authors to adhere to the
style used in a particular journal. That said, I don't see why Nature or
any other
On Sat, 9 May 2009, roger koenker wrote:
I've had an email exchange with the authors of a recent paper
in Nature who also made a good faith effort to cite both R and the quantreg
package, and were told that the Nature "house style" didn't allow such
citations so they were dropped from the publis
I've had an email exchange with the authors of a recent paper
in Nature who also made a good faith effort to cite both R and the
quantreg
package, and were told that the Nature "house style" didn't allow such
citations so they were dropped from the published paper and the
"supplementary materia
6 matches
Mail list logo
