Re: [R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence with multiple factors

2008-09-21 Thread Javier Acuña
Michael, so you're suggesting that I should do: aux <- interaction( Topology, Drift, lambda) and then fligner.test(dT~aux) Is that correct? On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Michael Dewey aghmed.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: > At 16:03 17/09/2008, Javier Acuña wrote: >> >> Hi, I'm a new user of R. My back

Re: [R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence, with multiple factors

2008-09-21 Thread Javier Acuña
>Ben Bolker ufl.edu> writes: > >I would try > >fligner.test(dT ~ Topology:Drift:lambda) > >in response to: > >Javier Acuna gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so > please bear with me if this is a silly question. > > I'm trying to assess wheth

Re: [R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence with multiple factors

2008-09-18 Thread Michael Dewey
At 16:03 17/09/2008, Javier Acuña wrote: Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so please bear with me if this is a silly question. For future reference you might find ?interaction helpful as another tool in your box. I'm trying to assess whether the results of an

Re: [R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence with multiple factors

2008-09-17 Thread Ben Bolker
Javier Acuña gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so > please bear with me if this is a silly question. > > I'm trying to assess whether the results of an experiment satisfy the > hypothesis of homoscedasticity (my ultimate goal is to use ANOV