Dear Micheal
So I would be much better off just reporting the PCA as is and conclude what i
can from plot
cheers
Julian
Julian R. Marchesi
Deputy Director and Professor of Clinical Microbiome Research at the Centre
for Digestive and Gut Health, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY Tel: +4
Significance tests for group differences in a MANOVA of
lm(cbind(pc1, pc2) ~ group)
will get you what you want, but you are advised DON'T DO THIS, at least
without a huge grain of salt and a slew of mea culpas.
Otherwise, you are committing p-value abuse and contributing to the
notion that sign
, Julian; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [R] testing whether clusters in a PCA plot are significantly
different from one another
In that case you should be able to use manova where pc1 and pc2 are the
independent (response) variables and group (Baseline, HFD+P, HFD) is the
dependent (explanatory
: Marchesi, Julian [mailto:j.march...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 9:02 AM
To: David L Carlson
Subject: Re: [R] testing whether clusters in a PCA plot are significantly
different from one another
Dear David
The clusters are defined by the metadata which tells R where to draw the lines
Rplot_PCA.pdf
Description: Rplot_PCA.pdf
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented
5 matches
Mail list logo