Nathaniel Street wrote:
>
>
> [questions about testing significance of random effects]
>
>
Pinheiro and Bates 2000 is the standard reference for this kind of question.
The basic answer is that the Likelihood Ratio Test (implemented by anova())
is a reasonable approach (and recommended by PB
> cc
> Sent by:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
> project.org [R] si
PROTECTED] Subject
project.org [R] significance for a random
effect in Mixed Model ANOVA
14/10/
In a number of cases I want to use mixed-model ANOVA tests where I am
interested in whether both the fixed and random effects (and their
interactions) are significant.
If I use this example
>library(nlme)
>data(Orthodont)
>anova(lme(distance ~ age + Sex, data = Orthodont, random = ~ 1))
I get th
4 matches
Mail list logo