Re: [R] reproduction archives

2011-06-05 Thread Laurent Gatto
On 5 June 2011 21:07, Alexander Shenkin wrote: > Hello Folks, > > As some of my old code broke when an updated package changed its > interface, I started thinking about reproduction of analyses.  It's not > good enough to save our code - we have to save the package versions > those analyses used a

Re: [R] reproduction archives

2011-06-05 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 11-06-05 4:07 PM, Alexander Shenkin wrote: Hello Folks, As some of my old code broke when an updated package changed its interface, I started thinking about reproduction of analyses. It's not good enough to save our code - we have to save the package versions those analyses used as well as t

Re: [R] reproduction archives

2011-06-05 Thread Petr Savicky
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 03:07:44PM -0500, Alexander Shenkin wrote: > Hello Folks, > > As some of my old code broke when an updated package changed its > interface, I started thinking about reproduction of analyses. It's not > good enough to save our code - we have to save the package versions > t

[R] reproduction archives

2011-06-05 Thread Alexander Shenkin
Hello Folks, As some of my old code broke when an updated package changed its interface, I started thinking about reproduction of analyses. It's not good enough to save our code - we have to save the package versions those analyses used as well as the R-core. I saw a couple references to "reprod