Re: [R] rep() fails at times=0.29*100

2013-04-09 Thread Jorge Fernando Saraiva de Menezes
[1] 29 > A.K. > > > - Original Message - > From: Jorge Fernando Saraiva de Menezes > To: r-help@r-project.org > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 12:11 PM > Subject: [R] rep() fails at times=0.29*100 > > Dear list, > > I have found an unusual behavior and would like to

Re: [R] rep() fails at times=0.29*100

2013-04-09 Thread Ted Harding
[See at end] On 09-Apr-2013 16:11:18 Jorge Fernando Saraiva de Menezes wrote: > Dear list, > > I have found an unusual behavior and would like to check if it is a > possible bug, and if updating R would fix it. I am not sure if should post > it in this mail list but I don't where is R bug tracker.

Re: [R] rep() fails at times=0.29*100

2013-04-09 Thread arun
Possibly R FAQ 7.31 length(rep(TRUE,signif(0.29*100,2))) #[1] 29 A.K. - Original Message - From: Jorge Fernando Saraiva de Menezes To: r-help@r-project.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 12:11 PM Subject: [R] rep() fails at times=0.29*100 Dear list, I have found an unusual

Re: [R] rep() fails at times=0.29*100

2013-04-09 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
FYI, > (0.29*100) < 29 [1] TRUE See R FAQ 7.31 for why. /Henrik On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de Menezes wrote: > Dear list, > > I have found an unusual behavior and would like to check if it is a > possible bug, and if updating R would fix it. I am not sure if should

[R] rep() fails at times=0.29*100

2013-04-09 Thread Jorge Fernando Saraiva de Menezes
Dear list, I have found an unusual behavior and would like to check if it is a possible bug, and if updating R would fix it. I am not sure if should post it in this mail list but I don't where is R bug tracker. The only mention I found that might relate to this is "If times is a computed quantity