Re: [R] p values from GLM

2016-04-03 Thread John Maindonald
oject.org<mailto:r-help-requ...@r-project.org> wrote: From: Heinz Tuechler mailto:tuech...@gmx.at>> Subject: Re: [R] p values from GLM Date: 3 April 2016 11:00:50 NZST To: Bert Gunter mailto:bgunter.4...@gmail.com>>, Duncan Murdoch mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>> Cc: r-help mail

Re: [R] p values from GLM

2016-04-03 Thread peter dalgaard
> On 03 Apr 2016, at 01:00 , Heinz Tuechler wrote: > > > Bert Gunter wrote on 01.04.2016 23:46: >> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... >> >> http://www.nature.com/news/statisticians-issue-warning-over-misuse-of-p-values-1.19503#/ref-link-1 >> > This paper repeats

Re: [R] p values from GLM

2016-04-02 Thread Heinz Tuechler
Bert Gunter wrote on 01.04.2016 23:46: ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... http://www.nature.com/news/statisticians-issue-warning-over-misuse-of-p-values-1.19503#/ref-link-1 This paper repeats the common place statement that a small p-value does not necessarily i

Re: [R] p values from GLM

2016-04-02 Thread Michael Artz
Maybe it's not the article itself for sale. Sometimes a company will charge a fee to have access to its knowledge base. Not because it owns all of the content, but because the articles, publications, etc have been tracked down and centralized. This is also the whole idea behind paying a company

Re: [R] p values from GLM

2016-04-02 Thread Spencer Graves
On 4/2/2016 11:07 AM, David Winsemius wrote: On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? Like Rolf, I thought that

Re: [R] p values from GLM

2016-04-02 Thread David Winsemius
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... > > They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance on April 1 deserved f

Re: [R] p values from GLM

2016-04-01 Thread Jeff Newmiller
Because they are Medusa statistics? -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On April 1, 2016 5:01:12 PM PDT, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... > >They're just statistics. How could it

Re: [R] p values from GLM

2016-04-01 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? Duncan Murdoch http://www.nature.com/news/statisticians-issue-warning-over-misuse-of-p-values-1.19503#/ref-link-1 Cheers

Re: [R] p values from GLM

2016-04-01 Thread Bert Gunter
... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... http://www.nature.com/news/statisticians-issue-warning-over-misuse-of-p-values-1.19503#/ref-link-1 Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -

Re: [R] p values from GLM

2016-04-01 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 01/04/2016 6:14 PM, John Sorkin wrote: > How can I get the p values from a glm ? I want to get the p values so I can add them to a custom report > > > fitwean<- glm(data[,"JWean"]~data[,"Group"],data=data,family=binomial(link ="logit")) > summary(fitwean) # This lists the coe

[R] p values from GLM

2016-04-01 Thread John Sorkin
How can I get the p values from a glm ? I want to get the p values so I can add them to a custom report fitwean<- glm(data[,"JWean"]~data[,"Group"],data=data,family=binomial(link ="logit")) summary(fitwean) # This lists the coefficeints, SEs, z and p values, but I can't isolate