Re: [R] non-parametric manova with post-hoc test

2017-01-19 Thread Bert Gunter
44 37 77181 > Fax +41 44 37 77201 > michael.eisenr...@agroscope.admin.ch<mailto:michael.eisenr...@agroscope.admin.ch> > www.agroscope.ch<http://www.agroscope.ch/> > > Von: Cade, Brian [mailto:ca...@usgs.gov] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Januar 2017 18:20 > An: Eisenring

Re: [R] non-parametric manova with post-hoc test

2017-01-19 Thread Bruno C
; Fax +41 44 37 77201 > michael.eisenr...@agroscope.admin.ch michael.eisenr...@agroscope.admin.ch> > www.agroscope.ch<http://www.agroscope.ch/> > > Von: Cade, Brian [mailto:ca...@usgs.gov] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Januar 2017 18:20 > An: Eisenring Michael Agroscope > Cc: r-he

Re: [R] non-parametric manova with post-hoc test

2017-01-18 Thread michael.eisenring
Cade, Brian [mailto:ca...@usgs.gov] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Januar 2017 18:20 An: Eisenring Michael Agroscope Cc: r-help@r-project.org Betreff: Re: [R] non-parametric manova with post-hoc test You could try a multi-response permutation procedure (MRPP) for multivariate hypothesis testing (null is groups

Re: [R] non-parametric manova with post-hoc test

2017-01-18 Thread Cade, Brian
You could try a multi-response permutation procedure (MRPP) for multivariate hypothesis testing (null is groups come from a common distribution) without resorting to ranks. There are no automated multiple comparison procedures, but one could either look at pairwise contrasts of group (if that is w

[R] non-parametric manova with post-hoc test

2017-01-18 Thread michael.eisenring
Good day, I am looking for a way to perform a non parametric manova and to analyze the result using post-hoc tests (an equivalent of the kruskal wallis test for anova) In my book (discovering statistic using R) two tests are described Munzel and Brunners method (mulrank) and Choi and Mardens tes