Re: [R] interpreting error estimate in SEM

>> -Original Message- >> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org >> ] > On >> Behalf Of Kathryn Barto >> Sent: February-09-10 6:23 AM >> To: r-help@r-project.org >> Subject: [R] interpreting error estimate in SEM &

Re: [R] interpreting error estimate in SEM

t; To: r-help@r-project.org > Subject: [R] interpreting error estimate in SEM > > hi, > > I'm using the sem package, and I want to make sure I'm interpreting the > output correctly. Here is an excerpt of my output. When I report the MWD > error, should I say that 59% o

[R] interpreting error estimate in SEM

hi, I'm using the sem package, and I want to make sure I'm interpreting the output correctly. Here is an excerpt of my output. When I report the MWD error, should I say that 59% of the variation in MWD is not explained by the model, or that 59% of the variation is explained, or something entire