I imagine mind_read() easy to implement with Robin Hankin's emulator
package -- under some weak assumptions about the user; mind_write(),
however, seems more involved and might require investing in new
hardware.
Best,
baptiste
On 21 May 2011 12:04, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> On reflection, it seems
On reflection, it seems to me that what we really need here
is Prof. Ripley's mind_read() function that was foreshadowed
some years ago (see fortune("mind_read")) so that R could
determine just *which* lm() (for example) function the user
has in mind when he or she types ``lm(...)'' at the keyboa
ntermountain Healthcare
greg.s...@imail.org
801.408.8111
> -Original Message-
> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces@r-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Rolf Turner
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 1:29 AM
> To: Jari Oksanen
> Cc: r-h...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subj
Thanks for the info.
I think I've tried that a while ago, but IIRCC, the problem was always
that R won't let me create on object that would pass as a full grown
NAMESPACE object.
> foo <- function(x) print(x)
> assignInNamespace(x="foo", value=foo, ns="testNS")
Fehler in loadNamespace(name) :
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Janko Thyson
wrote:
> Yet, IMHO there will be more and more problems regarding this in the
> future as the number of contributed packages keeps growing. I personally
> would not mind at all to get used to typing 'thePackage::foo()' *all*
> the time, or at least ha
Hi,
I encounter similar problems as well and posted a while ago about this.
Namespaces are cool, but isn't it very much up to a package's position
in the search path (which is quite arbitrary depending on the packages
loaded) that determines which namespace "dominates"? That leaves it to
the u
My understanding (which is pretty shaky when it comes to namespaces) is
that if you have things set up correctly then namespaces will make sure
that function calls within functions in the given package will be to be to
functions in that package and not to their doppelgangers in other packages
whi
Duncan Murdoch gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 18/05/2011 10:02 PM, Nick Matzke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If I load 2 packages that have a function with the same
> > name, how do I tell R to run one or the other?
> >
>
> If you are using a package without a namespace, expect problems. Having
> the na
On 18/05/2011 10:02 PM, Nick Matzke wrote:
Hi,
If I load 2 packages that have a function with the same
name, how do I tell R to run one or the other?
(Instead of having R automatically use the first- or
last-loaded one, whichever it is. (Which is it, by the way.))
Cheers!
Nick
It is the m
Thanks!!
Nick
On 5/18/11 7:06 PM, Ista Zahn wrote:
Hi Nick,
See ?"::"
Best,
Ista
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Nick Matzke wrote:
Hi,
If I load 2 packages that have a function with the same name, how do I tell
R to run one or the other?
(Instead of having R automatically use the first-
Hi Nick,
See ?"::"
Best,
Ista
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Nick Matzke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I load 2 packages that have a function with the same name, how do I tell
> R to run one or the other?
>
> (Instead of having R automatically use the first- or last-loaded one,
> whichever it is. (Whi
Is it not something like?
package1::myfunction
package2::myfunction
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Nick Matzke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I load 2 packages that have a function with the same
> name, how do I tell R to run one or the other?
>
> (Instead of having R automatically use the first
Hi,
If I load 2 packages that have a function with the same
name, how do I tell R to run one or the other?
(Instead of having R automatically use the first- or
last-loaded one, whichever it is. (Which is it, by the way.))
Cheers!
Nick
--
==
13 matches
Mail list logo
