Re: [R] giving priority to stats package

2019-11-26 Thread Greg Snow
I was thinking of using length(search())+1 to be safe and simple. Using grep gives higher priority than length while still solving your issue. On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 3:06 PM Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > Goold idea. This seems to work. > > library(dplyr, pos = grep("package:stats", search())

Re: [R] giving priority to stats package

2019-11-25 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Goold idea. This seems to work. library(dplyr, pos = grep("package:stats", search()) + 1) On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 1:27 PM Greg Snow <538...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You could use the `pos` arg to place the newly loaded package(s) on > the search path after the stats package. That would give prio

Re: [R] giving priority to stats package

2019-11-25 Thread Greg Snow
You could use the `pos` arg to place the newly loaded package(s) on the search path after the stats package. That would give priority for any functions in the stats package over the newly loaded package (but also give priority for any other packages earlier on the search path). On Sat, Nov 23, 20

[R] giving priority to stats package

2019-11-23 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
library and require have new args in 3.6 giving additional control over conflicts. This seems very useful but I was wondering if there were some, preferabley simple, way to give existing loaded packages priority without knowing the actual conflicts in advance. For example library(dplyr, excl