Re: [R] different results in MASS's mca and SAS's corresp

2011-02-07 Thread Gavin Simpson
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 23:39 -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:19 AM, David Winsemius > wrote: > > cbind(scalermca[,1] * 0.827094, scalermca[,2] * -0.7644828) > [,1][,2] > 1 1.06070017 -0.8154 > 2 0.77057891 0.63456780 > 3 1.07031764 -1.30675217 >

Re: [R] different results in MASS's mca and SAS's corresp

2011-02-06 Thread Mark Difford
>> When I came to David's comment, I understood the theory, but not the >> numbers in his answer. I wanted to see the MASS mca answers "match >> up" with SAS, and the example did not (yet). I am inclined to write, "O yea of little faith." David showed perfectly well that when the results of th

Re: [R] different results in MASS's mca and SAS's corresp

2011-02-05 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:19 AM, David Winsemius wrote: > > On Feb 4, 2011, at 7:06 PM, Gong-Yi Liao wrote: > >> Dear list: >> >>  I have tried MASS's mca function and SAS's PROC corresp on the >>  farms data (included in MASS, also used as mca's example), the >>  results are different: >> >>  R: m

Re: [R] different results in MASS's mca and SAS's corresp

2011-02-05 Thread David Winsemius
On Feb 4, 2011, at 7:06 PM, Gong-Yi Liao wrote: Dear list: I have tried MASS's mca function and SAS's PROC corresp on the farms data (included in MASS, also used as mca's example), the results are different: R: mca(farms)$rs: 1 2 1 0.059296637 0.0455871427

[R] different results in MASS's mca and SAS's corresp

2011-02-04 Thread Gong-Yi Liao
Dear list: I have tried MASS's mca function and SAS's PROC corresp on the farms data (included in MASS, also used as mca's example), the results are different: R: mca(farms)$rs: 1 2 1 0.059296637 0.0455871427 2 0.043077902 -0.0354728795 3 0.059834286