Because data.frame converts it. I don't know what rationale was originally used
to justify including that transformation automatically, but I think it is much
better this way than having POSIXlt in the data frame. POSIXlt is itself like a
little data frame, and having data frames inside of data
On 2015/1/5 20:51, David Winsemius wrote:
On Jan 5, 2015, at 5:47 PM, Jinsong Zhao wrote:
On 2015/1/5 17:28, Ben Bolker wrote:
Jinsong Zhao yeah.net> writes:
In the following code snippet,
#
a <- strptime("121114 0510", "%m%d%y %H%M")
b <- data.frame(date = a, res = 1:5)
class(a)
class(b[
On Jan 5, 2015, at 5:47 PM, Jinsong Zhao wrote:
> On 2015/1/5 17:28, Ben Bolker wrote:
>> Jinsong Zhao yeah.net> writes:
>>
>>
>>> In the following code snippet,
>>> #
>>> a <- strptime("121114 0510", "%m%d%y %H%M")
>>> b <- data.frame(date = a, res = 1:5)
>>> class(a)
>>> class(b[1,1])
>>> #
On 2015/1/5 17:28, Ben Bolker wrote:
Jinsong Zhao yeah.net> writes:
In the following code snippet,
#
a <- strptime("121114 0510", "%m%d%y %H%M")
b <- data.frame(date = a, res = 1:5)
class(a)
class(b[1,1])
#
I am wondering why the class of a and b[1,1] are not the same.
How to make the class
Jinsong Zhao yeah.net> writes:
> In the following code snippet,
> #
> a <- strptime("121114 0510", "%m%d%y %H%M")
> b <- data.frame(date = a, res = 1:5)
> class(a)
> class(b[1,1])
> #
> I am wondering why the class of a and b[1,1] are not the same.
>
> How to make the class of a and b[1,1] to b
Hi there,
In the following code snippet,
#
a <- strptime("121114 0510", "%m%d%y %H%M")
b <- data.frame(date = a, res = 1:5)
class(a)
class(b[1,1])
#
I am wondering why the class of a and b[1,1] are not the same.
How to make the class of a and b[1,1] to be same?
I would really appreciate you for
6 matches
Mail list logo
