On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Dimitri Liakhovitski
wrote:
> Thanks a lot, Sarah.
> I assume, if the values against which I am comparing are REALLY zero
> ("0") - then even the first one (mean(testvec[testvec != 0])) should
> work, right?
> Dimitri
Well, yes. But what's "really" zero?
> ((.2 +
Sarah et. al:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Sarah Goslee wrote:
> In the more general case, that approach is prone to machine precision
> error (FAQ 7.31).
>
> Here's a clunky but safer alternative:
>
Perhaps ?zapsmall .
However, I would agree with your sentiments that it may depend on
conte
Thanks a lot, Sarah.
I assume, if the values against which I am comparing are REALLY zero
("0") - then even the first one (mean(testvec[testvec != 0])) should
work, right?
Dimitri
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Sarah Goslee wrote:
> In the more general case, that approach is prone to machine pr
In the more general case, that approach is prone to machine precision
error (FAQ 7.31).
Here's a clunky but safer alternative:
> set.seed(1234)
> testvec <- sample(0:10, 100, replace=TRUE)
> mean(testvec)
[1] 4.31
> mean(testvec[testvec != 0])
[1] 4.842697
> mean(testvec[!sapply(testvec, function
You can do it by subsetting or indexing
r<-c(0,0,0,rnorm(10,10,5))
> mean(r)
[1] 8.052215
> mean(r[r!=0])
[1] 10.46788
Weidong Gu
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Dimitri Liakhovitski
wrote:
> Sorry if it's been discussed before - don't seem to find it.
> I'd like to calculate a mean while ign
Sorry if it's been discussed before - don't seem to find it.
I'd like to calculate a mean while ignoring zeros.
"mean" doesn't seem to have an option for that.
Any other function/package that could do it?
Thanks for a pointer!
--
Dimitri Liakhovitski
marketfusionanalytics.com
__
6 matches
Mail list logo