On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:49:03 -0700,
Jeff Laake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again thanks for the input. I've been a recipient of this list for
> quite a few years although I don't post often. It is an invaluable
> resource and I appreciate the effort of all the contributors. I
> support a lot o
Again thanks for the input. I've been a recipient of this list for
quite a few years although I don't post often. It is an invaluable
resource and I appreciate the effort of all the contributors. I support
a lot of software so I know how much work it can be.
I've seen the "reproducible code
Thanks to those that replied. It was reproducible on my system but it
was nested within other code which would have been obvious had I left
the browse> portions in it. The reason for the behavior was obvious
when I used str(samples). Even though Effort looked like a vector in
samples, it was
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:04:57 -0700,
Jeff Laake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any insight into the behavior of "by" in the following case would be
> appreciated. There is a note in the help details for "by" about
> documenting behavior since v2.7 but I don't entirely understand what
> it is saying.
On 29/10/2008, at 2:04 PM, Jeff Laake wrote:
Any insight into the behavior of "by" in the following case would be
appreciated. There is a note in the help details for "by" about
documenting behavior since v2.7 but I don't entirely understand
what it
is saying. I'm using R2.7.2 Windows. I'
Any insight into the behavior of "by" in the following case would be
appreciated. There is a note in the help details for "by" about
documenting behavior since v2.7 but I don't entirely understand what it
is saying. I'm using R2.7.2 Windows. I'm interested if the following
behavior was a cha
6 matches
Mail list logo
