Re: [R] Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U value: outcomes from different stat packages

On 30-May-2012 07:33:12 peter dalgaard wrote: > > On May 29, 2012, at 17:55 , maxbre wrote: >> Given this example >> [snip] >> And given the fact that: >> >> - in the note of R Wilcox.test is clearly stated: "The literature >> is not unanimous about the definitions of the Wilcoxon rank sum >> and

Re: [R] Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U value: outcomes from different stat packages

On May 29, 2012, at 17:55 , maxbre wrote: > Given this example > > #start code > > a<-c(0,70,50,100,70,650,1300,6900,1780,4930,1120,700,190,940, > > 760,100,300,36270,5610,249680,1760,4040,164890,17230,75140,1870,22380,5890,2430) > > b<-c(0,0,10,30,50,440,1000,140,70,90,60,60,20,90,180,30,90,

Re: [R] Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U value: outcomes from different stat packages

On May 29, 2012, at 17:55 , maxbre wrote: > Given this example > > #start code > > a<-c(0,70,50,100,70,650,1300,6900,1780,4930,1120,700,190,940, > > 760,100,300,36270,5610,249680,1760,4040,164890,17230,75140,1870,22380,5890,2430) > > b<-c(0,0,10,30,50,440,1000,140,70,90,60,60,20,90,180,30,90,

[R] Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U value: outcomes from different stat packages

Given this example #start code a<-c(0,70,50,100,70,650,1300,6900,1780,4930,1120,700,190,940, 760,100,300,36270,5610,249680,1760,4040,164890,17230,75140,1870,22380,5890,2430) b<-c(0,0,10,30,50,440,1000,140,70,90,60,60,20,90,180,30,90, 3220,490,20790,290,740,5350,940,3910,0,640,850,260)