Lavaan is a nice package too, thanks for mentioning it. Given sufficient
understanding of matrices, I think OpenMx is arguably as or more powerful than
Mplus---it runs circles around Mplus in terms of flexibility, although Mplus
does what it does well, with (IMO) fairly sensible defaults, and s
Dear Ravi,
I would also suggest you to have a look at 'lavaan' (www.lavaan.org). It
has an extremely straightforward yet flexible model syntax and very good
documentation. Although its statistical capabilities are not comparable to
those of Mplus (which is the most powerful SEM-software I think),
Hi Ravi,
Look at openmx, it uses R to do matrix optimization especially for SEM (though
more general too). It does not have the draw paths interactively feature, but
it is extremely powerful and flexible. I have used Amos, EQS, Mplus, Lisrel,
and OpenMx and I believe OpenMx is competitive aga
Can anyone give me links to reviews/comparisons of R with Amos for SEM? I
have found some but they are a little old (2009).
Ravi
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Structural-equation-modelling-in-R-compared-with-Amos-tp3921654p3921654.html
Sent from the R help mail
4 matches
Mail list logo
