Hi,
You did a really good job providing a reproducible example, except
that you didn't mention which package sem() comes from. (sem, I'm
assuming).
I don't know how you came up with your covariance matrix, but it
*isn't* symmetric:
> isSymmetric(S.Seed.BB)
[1] FALSE
> S.Seed.BB[6, 2]
[1] 37.758
Hello, I tried to do a 'sem' analysis for data of how blueberry consumption
by birds is influenced by a pollution gradient, using distance and
vegetation structural and composition variables, but I got the following
error message:
Error in sem.default(ram = ram, S = S, N = N, param.names = pars, v
Dear Kesinee,
> -Original Message-
> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Kes
> Sent: March-07-11 9:51 PM
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: [R] SEM error
>
> Dear All,
> I am new for R and SEM. I try to fi
Dear All,
I am new for R and SEM. I try to fit the model with Y (ordinal outcome), X
(4 categorical data), M1-M3 (continuous), and 2 covariates (Age&sex) as a
diagram.
library(polycor)
model.ly <-specify.model()
1: x -> m1, gam11, NA
2: x -> m2, gam12, NA
3: x -> m3, gam13, NA
4: age -> m1, gam1
Hi,
many thanks for the help (i would swear I controlled the model specification
like 15 times...).
It runs correctly now!
Best wishes,
Jan Schubert
Institute of Social Science
Charles University, Prague
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/sem-error-no-variance-or
> -Original Message-
> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Jan Schubert
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:51 PM
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: [R] sem error "no variance or error-variance parameter"
>
Hi,
I am sorry to post the message again but I really need some advise on that.
I am using the R version 2.11.0 and the version of sem package: sem_0.9-20
under Windows XP.
I read the questions:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/computationally-singular-and-lack-of-variance-parameters-in-SEM-td891081.
Hi,
I am using the R version 2.11.0 and the version of sem package: sem_0.9-20
under Windows XP.
I read the questions:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/computationally-singular-and-lack-of-variance-parameters-in-SEM-td891081.html#a891082
and
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/computationally-singular-a
Dear Jarret, Uwe, and Dan,
Sorry -- I missed the initial question. What's a bit odd here is that the
singularity occurs only in the computation of the modification indices. It
might help to look at the conditioning of the covariance matrix of the
parameter estimates (i.e., the eigenvalues or si
I have often found this to happen if the scale of one variable is
orders of magnitude different than the scale of other variables. Have
you tried inspecting the covariance matrix and log transforming any
such variables?
On Feb 22, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 20.02.2010 08:51
On 20.02.2010 08:51, Dan Edgcumbe wrote:
I'm trying to do some confirmatory factor analysis on some data. My SEM
model solves in 22 iterations, but when I try to look at the modification
indices, using mod.indices, I get the following error message:
Error in solve.default(hessian) :
system
I'm trying to do some confirmatory factor analysis on some data. My SEM
model solves in 22 iterations, but when I try to look at the modification
indices, using mod.indices, I get the following error message:
Error in solve.default(hessian) :
system is computationally singular: reciprocal condit
12 matches
Mail list logo