Re: [R] RE : Must be easy, but haven't found the function (numerical integration)

> > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > Behalf Of Ptit_Bleu > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:24 AM > To: r-help@r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R] RE : Must be easy, but

Re: [R] RE : Must be easy, but haven't found the function (numerical integration)

dhan.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ptit_Bleu Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:24 AM To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] RE : Must be easy, but haven't found the function (numerical integration) Thanks to all. cumsum can be h

Re: [R] RE : Must be easy, but haven't found the function (numerical integration)

Thanks to all. cumsum can be helpful but the solution given by David seems to match my request. I will test it as soon as possible (before the end of the week, I hope). Have a nice end of day, Ptit Bleu. GOUACHE David wrote: > > try : > > library(Bolsatd) > ?sintegral > > or: > > library

[R] RE : Must be easy, but haven't found the function (numerical integration)

try : library(Bolsatd) ?sintegral or: library(caTools) ?trapz David Gouache Arvalis - Institut du Végétal Station de La Minière 78280 Guyancourt Tel: 01.30.12.96.22 / Port: 06.86.08.94.32 -Message d'origine- De : Ptit_Bleu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 17 septembre 2007 12