Hi Paul & Brian: Thanks for your replies!
Paul: Thank you for the encouragement. You're right that I don't
need the working examples or Doodle generator in WinBugs. I'm
wondering what open-source components could easily substitute for the
core Bugs functionality? Do you know if any of these w
Hey, good topic for a thread. I've wrestled with this over the years.
I think there's some user confusion about what WinBUGS does. People
who did not see BUGS before WinBUGS tend not to understand this in the
same way...
The unique / important contributions from WinBUGS are the collection
of wo
I've done some looking around in R and elsewhere to answer my question
on the value of R vs. Bugs for MCMC. So, for anyone who is curious,
here's what I think I've found: Bugs compiles its code, which should
make it much faster than a pure R program. Packages such as AMCMC run
MCMC in R, potenti
Your request is too vague for us to be very helpful. However OpenBUGS
runs without very frequent crashes only on some ix86 Linux machines -- and
what those are is unclear and Uwe Ligges and I (working on BRugs) have
been unable to find one recently.
There are dozens of Bayesian MCMC packages
A naive question from a non-statistician: I'm looking into running a
Bayesian analysis of a model with high dimensionality. It's not a
standard model (the likelihood requires a lot of code to implement),
and I'm using a Linux machine. Was wondering if someone
has any thoughts on what the advanta
5 matches
Mail list logo
