> LIST OF CONVENTIONS/STYLES FOR R:
>
> [1] R coding standards in the R Internals manual
> http://www.cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-ints.html#R-coding-standards
>
> [2] Bioconductor coding standards
> http://wiki.fhcrc.org/bioc/Coding_Standards
>
> [3] Google R style
> [http://google-styleg
; Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 9:34 AM
> To: Venables, Bill (CMIS, Dutton Park)
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] R Style Guide -- Was Post-hoc tests in MASS using glm.nb
>
>
> On 19/05/11 10:26, bill.venab...@csiro.au wrote:
>
>
> > Most of [the Google styl
Is a list like Henrik's (below) available someplace on r-project.org or
on your local CRAN mirror? If no, where do you think it might most
conveniently fit? What about "www.r-project.org/other-docs.html"?
Perhaps add a bullet right under the link to "DevCheatSheet has a
collection of R Refere
Thanks Martin,
Your points are, of course, well taken. Nevertheless, I still think it
might be useful to put a link or links to one or more style guides in
the FAQ with a comment to the effect that these are various
recommended ways to help write better, more readable code. Something
like:
--
BertG> Thanks Bill. Do you and others think that a link to
BertG> this guide (or another)should be included in the
BertG> Posting Guide and/or R FAQ?
Hmm, that guide is Google's work, and is probably quite good if
you have a group of R programmers in the same company,
but e.g., has no
On 05/19/2011 09:45 AM, Joshua Wiley wrote:
... the
advantages of formal classes seem worth at least not entirely
dismissing.
Hmmm, yeah, that's about the grammatical equivalent of S4 classes.
Jim
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.et
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:28 PM, David Scott wrote:
> Another style guide is at:
> http://www1.maths.lth.se/help/R/RCC/
>
> Listed as a first draft and dated 2005, but still worth a read. Has some
> references also.
That URL obsolete (I need to have it removed) - a more recent/stable
URL is [5]
Another style guide is at:
http://www1.maths.lth.se/help/R/RCC/
Listed as a first draft and dated 2005, but still worth a read. Has some
references also.
I think I recall Hadley having a style guide which he requested his
students followed, but I didn't like it too much (sorry Hadley) .
I
Subject: Re: [R] R Style Guide -- Was Post-hoc tests in MASS using glm.nb
On 19/05/11 10:26, bill.venab...@csiro.au wrote:
> Most of [the Google style guide's] advice is very good (meaning I agree with
> it!) but some is a bit too much (for example, the blanket advice never to use
&g
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Timothy Bates wrote:
lol:-)
is there a way to get a fortune on start up in R?
One possible way is to put something like this into your .Rprofile
if(interactive()) {
library("fortunes")
fortune()
}
The interactive() condition avoids having it in the output of certain
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Timothy Bates
wrote:
> lol:-)
> is there a way to get a fortune on start up in R?
You could require() and fortune() one in your .Rprofile
> On 19 May 2011, at 00:33, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19/05/11 10:26, bill.venab...@csiro.au wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Most of [
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
> On 19/05/11 10:26, bill.venab...@csiro.au wrote:
>
>>
>> Most of [the Google style guide's] advice is very good (meaning I agree
>> with it!) but some is a bit too much (for example, the blanket advice never
>> to use S4 classes and methods -
lol:-)
is there a way to get a fortune on start up in R?
On 19 May 2011, at 00:33, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> On 19/05/11 10:26, bill.venab...@csiro.au wrote:
>
>
>> Most of [the Google style guide's] advice is very good (meaning I agree with
>> it!) but some is a bit too much (for example, the b
On 19/05/11 10:26, bill.venab...@csiro.au wrote:
Most of [the Google style guide's] advice is very good (meaning I agree with
it!) but some is a bit too much (for example, the blanket advice never to use
S4 classes and methods - that's just resisting progress, in my view).
I must respectf
Hi Bert,
I think people should know about the Google Sytle Guide for R because, as I
said, it represents a thoughtful contribution to the debate. Most of its
advice is very good (meaning I agree with it!) but some is a bit too much (for
example, the blanket advice never to use S4 classes and m
This is the first time I've seen an R Style Guide. I will admit that I
haven't looked for one previously, but nevertheless I still haven't seen
one. My code style simply evolved (perhaps, chugged along) by reading posts
from other users who post to the r-help community.
I regularly program with a
Thanks Bill. Do you and others think that a link to this guide (or
another)should be included in the Posting Guide and/or R FAQ?
-- Bert
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:07 PM, wrote:
> Amen to all of that, Bert. Nicely put. The google style guide (not perfect,
> but a thoughtful contribution on th
17 matches
Mail list logo
