Re: [R] R-help "spam" detection; please help the moderators

2010-06-02 Thread Joshua Wiley
Hello Martin and Ted, First off thank you to you guys and all the volunteers for providing this wonderful service. I have two questions. 1) Do you know if it is a problem to respond to a post from nabble using a gmail account? 2) Would it be easier for you if people just used non free account

Re: [R] R-help "spam" detection; please help the moderators

2010-06-01 Thread Ted Harding
Hi Joris, The "matched a filter rule" is the principal reason for holding messages for moderation. Please don't become anxious about the situation -- one of the reasons we have become concerned about the situation is that people whose messages get held up do tend to become worried about it. This is

Re: [R] R-help "spam" detection; please help the moderators

2010-06-01 Thread Joris Meys
Hi all, I also couldn't help but notice that some of my messages are bounced for following reason: The message headers matched a filter rule I included the header of one of the messages below, but neither of these messages is sent trough Nabble, nor does any mail address has digits in it. I a

[R] R-help "spam" detection; please help the moderators

2010-06-01 Thread Martin Maechler
Dear readers of R-help as most of you will *not* be aware, R-help has continued to work the way it does, only thanks to a dozen of volunteers, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help . The volunteers manually moderate e-mails that "look like spam" (and sometimes are and sometimes are not