Re: [R] Predictions on training set shorter than training set

2015-04-23 Thread William Dunlap
Are there missing values in your data? If so, try adding the argument na.action = na.exclude to your original call to glm or lm. It is like the default na.omit except that it records which rows were omitted (because they contained missing values) and fills in the corresponding entries in the p

[R] Predictions on training set shorter than training set

2015-04-23 Thread Mark Drummond
Hi all, Given a simple logistic regression on a training data set using glm, the number of predicted values is less than the number of observations in the training set: > fit.train.pred <- predict(fit, type = "response") > nrow(train) [1] 62660 > length(fit.train.pred) [1] 58152 > As a relative