Re: [R] NLS results different from Excel -- Tricky fortunes nomination

2013-03-14 Thread John Kane
No , but please RSVP if you disagree with me. John Kane Kingston ON Canada > -Original Message- > From: cl...@ecy.wa.gov > Sent: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:28:46 -0700 (PDT) > To: gunter.ber...@gene.com > Subject: Re: [R] NLS results different from Excel -- Tricky fortun

Re: [R] NLS results different from Excel -- Tricky fortunes nomination

2013-03-14 Thread Clint Bowman
Following up on Bert's nomination, may I take one from a recent email I received? "The second file is air concentrations against frequencies plotted by SAS; however we don't have the SAS statistical package..." I thought the original name for SAS was Statistical Analysis System--am I missing

Re: [R] NLS results different from Excel -- Tricky fortunes nomination

2013-02-20 Thread Rolf Turner
I think that this nomination is a Good Idea! cheers, Rolf On 02/21/2013 06:50 AM, Bert Gunter wrote: Folks: I thought the following excerpt from Bruce McCullough's post would be a good candidate for the R fortunes package -- except that it's about Excel, not R! So I nominate it.

Re: [R] NLS results different from Excel -- Tricky fortunes nomination

2013-02-20 Thread Bert Gunter
Folks: I thought the following excerpt from Bruce McCullough's post would be a good candidate for the R fortunes package -- except that it's about Excel, not R! So I nominate it... but leave it to others to say whether it's really "qualified" to be nominated. "The idea that the Excel solver