Re: [R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Avi Gross via R-help
ri, Jan 14, 2022 5:11 pm Subject: Re: [R] NAs are removed I have a variable in dataset "CA", which has the following values: [1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 [40] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Re: [R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Ebert,Timothy Aaron
y, January 14, 2022 5:11 PM To: Ebert,Timothy Aaron Cc: Jim Lemon ; r-help mailing list Subject: Re: [R] NAs are removed [External Email] I have a variable in dataset "CA", which has the following values: [1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Re: [R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Neha gupta
riday, January 14, 2022 4:50 PM > To: Jim Lemon > Cc: r-help mailing list > Subject: Re: [R] NAs are removed > > [External Email] > > Hi Jim and Ebert > > How I am using divide by zero, I did not understand? I am using caret and > AUC metric. > > If I do, what is

Re: [R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Ebert,Timothy Aaron
m hinges on what "fraction" is in your program. Tim -Original Message- From: R-help On Behalf Of Neha gupta Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 4:50 PM To: Jim Lemon Cc: r-help mailing list Subject: Re: [R] NAs are removed [External Email] Hi Jim and Ebert How I am using divide by zer

Re: [R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Neha gupta
I have a variable CA which has a value of 1 or 2, and I am using this code in if statement prot <- ifelse(ts$CA == '2', 0, 1) On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:04 PM Bill Dunlap wrote: > > fraction <- 0/0 > > if (fraction < .5) TRUE else FALSE > Error in if (fraction < 0.5) TRUE else FALSE : > missi

Re: [R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Neha gupta
Hi Jim and Ebert How I am using divide by zero, I did not understand? I am using caret and AUC metric. If I do, what is the solution? On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote: > Hi Neha, > You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess > is that there's a divide by

Re: [R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Bill Dunlap
> fraction <- 0/0 > if (fraction < .5) TRUE else FALSE Error in if (fraction < 0.5) TRUE else FALSE : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed -Bill On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:55 PM Bert Gunter wrote: > Unlikely. > > > 1/0 > [1] Inf ## not NA > > Bert > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:41 PM Jim Le

Re: [R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 14/01/2022 3:54 p.m., Bert Gunter wrote: Unlikely. 1/0 [1] Inf ## not NA However: > if (0/0 <= 1) print("something") Error in if (0/0 <= 1) print("something") : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed Duncan Murdoch Bert On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote: Hi Neha,

Re: [R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Bert Gunter
Unlikely. > 1/0 [1] Inf ## not NA Bert On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote: > Hi Neha, > You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess > is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind. > > Jim > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta > wro

Re: [R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Jim Lemon
Hi Neha, You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind. Jim On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta wrote: > > Hi everyone > > I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error > > Error in if (fraction <=

[R] NAs are removed

2022-01-14 Thread Neha gupta
Hi everyone I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed My data is: data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables: $ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... $ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... $ McCabe