On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:54:53 -0700
Bert Gunter wrote:
> ... and also note in the *Color Specification* section of ?par, to
> which ?points points,
>
> "Additionally, "transparent" is transparent, useful for filled areas
> (such as the background!), and just invisible for things like lines or
> t
... and also note in the *Color Specification* section of ?par, to
which ?points points,
"Additionally, "transparent" is transparent, useful for filled areas
(such as the background!), and just invisible for things like lines or
text. In most circumstances (integer) NA is equivalent to
"transparen
?text says
"... NA values of font are replaced by par("font"), and similarly for col."
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along
and sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 2:
I've just noticed what seems to me to be somewhat peculiar behaviour in
respect of how different plotting functions treat a specification
"col=NA".
Consider:
plot(1:10)
text(4,6,labels="o",col=NA)
points(6,4,col=NA)
The symbol produced by the call to text() shows up (is black).
The symbol prod
4 matches
Mail list logo
