Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 07/03/2010 5:26 PM, rkevinbur...@charter.net wrote:
Thatnk you.
The documentation indicates as you indicated that if there is not an exact
match then the next element is chosen. But it does not indicate the case that
contains an exact match but there is not value t
On 07/03/2010 5:26 PM, rkevinbur...@charter.net wrote:
Thatnk you.
The documentation indicates as you indicated that if there is not an exact
match then the next element is chosen. But it does not indicate the case that
contains an exact match but there is not value to be returned (=, case). F
Thatnk you.
The documentation indicates as you indicated that if there is not an exact
match then the next element is chosen. But it does not indicate the case that
contains an exact match but there is not value to be returned (=, case). From
what you indicate this is treated as if it was not a
On 06.03.2010 21:49, rkevinbur...@charter.net wrote:
In browsing the source I see the following construct:
res<- switch(type, working = , response = r, deviance = ,
pearson = if (is.null(object$weights))
r
else r * sqrt(object$weights), partial = r)
I under
In browsing the source I see the following construct:
res <- switch(type, working = , response = r, deviance = ,
pearson = if (is.null(object$weights))
r
else r * sqrt(object$weights), partial = r)
I understand that 'switch' will execute the code that is matched
5 matches
Mail list logo
