Although I was wrong on what I was trying to decompose that didn't work
either however after a conversation with the lecturer the problem has been
found and solved.
Gavin Simpson wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 05:03 -0800, ethanhaas wrote:
>> I was, and the answer is yes, but I figured the
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 05:03 -0800, ethanhaas wrote:
> I was, and the answer is yes, but I figured the easiest way for you to
> understand is for me to say exactly what I am trying to do. Perhaps I don't
> even need to decompose (although I think I do). If I can get past this
> problem it would mak
I was, and the answer is yes, but I figured the easiest way for you to
understand is for me to say exactly what I am trying to do. Perhaps I don't
even need to decompose (although I think I do). If I can get past this
problem it would make everything else so much easier.
P.Dalgaard wrote:
>
>
ethanhaas wrote:
> What I'm trying to do is have plots and summary statistics of x
> (autocorrelations for example) where x refers to the data in using, and I
> thought decomposing would be the way to go about it.
>
>
>
You are not listening. I give up.
> P.Dalgaard wrote:
>
>> ethanhaas wro
What I'm trying to do is have plots and summary statistics of x
(autocorrelations for example) where x refers to the data in using, and I
thought decomposing would be the way to go about it.
P.Dalgaard wrote:
>
> ethanhaas wrote:
>> I simply called it information but I can also call it data if
ethanhaas wrote:
> I simply called it information but I can also call it data if you wish, it
> doesn't make a difference.
> The timeseries is simply the time series of this data between the two dates
> and using is the data up to 1990 as opposed to 1994.
>
>
And isn't it one of the latter two y
I simply called it information but I can also call it data if you wish, it
doesn't make a difference.
The timeseries is simply the time series of this data between the two dates
and using is the data up to 1990 as opposed to 1994.
P.Dalgaard wrote:
>
> ethanhaas wrote:
>> I've been trying for t
ethanhaas wrote:
> I've been trying for the past 3 weeks to use R (much better than Matlab but I
> am very bad with computers so I am very new to all of this) and know how to
> input the data (hey, it's a start!) but every time I type in the following:
>
> dcm <- decompose(information)
>
> I get th
I've been trying for the past 3 weeks to use R (much better than Matlab but I
am very bad with computers so I am very new to all of this) and know how to
input the data (hey, it's a start!) but every time I type in the following:
dcm <- decompose(information)
I get the following error message:
9 matches
Mail list logo
