Thanks for the help.
Frederic Ntirenganya
Maseno University,
African Maths Initiative,
Kenya.
Mobile:(+254)718492836
Email: fr...@aims.ac.za
https://sites.google.com/a/aims.ac.za/fredo/
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:48 PM, S Ellison wrote:
>
> > Call:
> > lm(formula = curr_data[[tmin_col]] ~ curr_d
> Call:
> lm(formula = curr_data[[tmin_col]] ~ curr_data[[year_col]] -
> 1 | curr_data[[month_col]])
First, this is not a sensible formula for lm; lm() does not use '|' to denote
grouping. It would be a valid formula for xyplot, in which | specifies grouping
variables. In lm(), '|' is sim
On 25/03/2015 12:30, Frederic Ntirenganya wrote:
Hi all,
I am doing analysis which involves fitting a line on trellis plot.
But the commands below (or at least the output from them) are not
plotting commands.
The
factor is month. As you know a year has 12 months and I expect to get
12 l
Hi all,
I am doing analysis which involves fitting a line on trellis plot. The
factor is month. As you know a year has 12 months and I expect to get
12 lines one for each month. I am getting the following results which
is different to my expectation. Am I have to do anything about the
data? Any su
4 matches
Mail list logo