;index=101432>
wolfgang.viechtba...@maastrichtuniversity.nl]
Inviato: venerd� 21 novembre 2014 15:37
A: Michael Dewey; Mario Petretta;
<https://inbox.unina.it/horde/imp/message.php?mailbox=INBOX&index=101432>
r-help@r-project.org
Oggetto: RE: [R] Comparing summary hazard ratios in meta-analysis
Those
Petretta; r-help@r-project.org
Oggetto: RE: [R] Comparing summary hazard ratios in meta-analysis
Those hazard ratios and CIs seem a bit strange. On the log-scale, they should
be symmetric, but they are not. Could be due to heavy rounding though. At any
rate, it comes down to this:
hr<- c(3
8-4170 | http://www.wvbauer.com
> -Original Message-
> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Michael Dewey
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 13:25
> To: Mario Petretta; r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] Comparing
On 21/11/2014 08:51, Mario Petretta wrote:
Dear all,
I use R 3.1.1 for Windows.
I performed two different meta-analysis assessing the prognostic value of
two different tests in patients with coronary artery disease. The study
included in the two analysis are different.
That makes life simpl
Dear all,
I use R 3.1.1 for Windows.
I performed two different meta-analysis assessing the prognostic value of
two different tests in patients with coronary artery disease. The study
included in the two analysis are different.
The variable of interest in dichotomous (normal/abnormal result) for
5 matches
Mail list logo
