All: Kindly take this offline please.
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:39 PM Abby Spurdle wrote:
> > Sorry, Abby, I do d
> Sorry, Abby, I do disagree here ((strongly enough as to warrant
> this reply) :
Which part are you disagreeing with?
That unambiquous names/references should be used, or that there are
many R functions for GLMs.
The wording of your post, suggests (kind of), that there is only one R
function for
> Abby Spurdle
> on Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:13:51 +1200 writes:
> That's a bit harsh. Isn't the best advice here, to post a
> reproducible example... Which I believe has been
> mentioned.
> Also, I'd strongly encourage people to use
> package+function name, for this
That's a bit harsh.
Isn't the best advice here, to post a reproducible example...
Which I believe has been mentioned.
Also, I'd strongly encourage people to use package+function name, for
this sort of thing.
stats::glm
As there are many R functions for GLMs...
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 12:47
On 2/08/20 5:39 am, Paul Bernal wrote:
Dear friends,
Hope you are doing great. I want to fit a logistic regression in R, where
the dependent variable is the covid status (I used 1 for covid positives,
and 0 for covid negatives), but when I ran the glm, R complains that I
should make the depen
5 matches
Mail list logo
